The Madhya Pradesh High Court rejected former district judge Giribala Singh's bail plea, saying the investigation is continuing and forensic and digital extraction reports are awaited. She faces allegations of abetment of suicide and dowry-related offences over the death of her daughter-in-law, Twisha Sharma; she denies wrongdoing through her counsel, and the matter is under CBI investigation.
Why it matters: The case involves a former judge, a CBI probe and dowry-related charges, so it tests how courts handle bail in high-profile dowry and abetment cases.
This matter is before the courts or under investigation. Nazariya reports what was said and alleged; it does not decide guilt or the outcome.
Based on 7 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 5 of 15 (Hindustan Times, Indian Express, India Today, Aaj Tak, Republic).
All outlets report the bail rejection in a neutral, court-focused way; they differ mainly in which details they include, such as the defence's arguments and the case dates.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: A court report on a bail rejection in a dowry and abetment-of-suicide case. It touches none of the ideological dimensions and gives both defence and prosecution arguments, with no government framing.
Why: Plain report of a High Court bail rejection in a criminal case. It touches no religion, social justice or statism themes and takes no side on the government.
Why: Court report on a bail rejection in a dowry death case; no religion, social justice or statism angle, and the outlet neither praises nor criticises any government.
Why: Court report on a bail denial in a dowry-harassment and suicide case; it touches no ideological dimension and gives both defence and prosecution arguments.
Why: Plain court report on a bail rejection in a criminal case; no policy, identity, or statism angle and no government framing, so not ideological.
Why: A court-reported bail rejection in a criminal death case with no religion, social justice or statism angle; it relays the judge's observations without taking a political position.
Why: A court report on a bail denial in a dowry death case, relaying the judge's reasoning. It has no policy, identity or statism angle and no government framing.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Sport results skip winding down and are archived after about 2 days, unless police or a court are involved. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.
How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.
Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.
Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.
Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.
Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.