The CBI questioned former MLA Suresh Rathore in Haridwar on Saturday in the 2022 Ankita Bhandari murder case, and Rathore said he cooperated and told the truth. Ankita's parents have met senior CBI officials and protested at India Gate against Dushyant Kumar Gautam's appointment as Sikkim governor, while Gautam denies the family's allegations.
Why it matters: The case has drawn sustained public anger over accountability of powerful people, and a central agency's probe now touches a former BJP MLA and a newly appointed Governor.
This matter is before the courts or under investigation. Nazariya reports what was said and alleged; it does not decide guilt or the outcome.
Based on 5 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 3 of 15 (Zee News, ABP, Times Now). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
Coverage is largely consistent and factual; outlets differ mainly on whether they add the family's and opposition's allegations about Gautam, and on follow-up questioning of Urmila Sanawar.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Mostly factual report of CBI questioning, with family and opposition allegations balanced by Gautam's denial. Touches civil liberties and accountability of powerful figures only lightly, so near centre.
Why: Plain wire report of a CBI questioning in a criminal case; it relays all sides without loaded wording and touches none of the ideological dimensions.
Why: Straight report of a CBI questioning in a criminal case; no clear policy or ideological framing, and it gives space to Rathore, the parents, the Congress and the state government.
Why: Factual report of a CBI questioning in a murder case. It touches no ideological dimension, and sourcing is balanced across Rathore, CBI, the parents and the opposition, so stance is neutral.
Why: Crime investigation report on a CBI probe; no religion, social-justice or statism angle. Reporting is mostly factual with both government and opposition context, so stance is neutral.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.