Latest: Delhi AQI slips back to 'poor' at 230 on Wednesday; two areas 'very poor'
Delhi's AQI was 230 at 8 am on Wednesday, October 28, in the 'poor' category per CPCB, with Jahangirpuri and Vivek Vihar 'very poor', after a 'moderate' spell that included 191 on Saturday and 197 on Tuesday. The Centre's early warning system forecasts improvement to 'moderate' from October 29 to 30, while Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa had earlier said the Delhi government is in 'war mode' on pollution. Summary updated 28 Oct, 14:36 IST
Why it matters: Delhi-NCR residents face swings in air quality and GRAP curbs on vehicles, which affect daily travel and health.
Winding down: no new coverage since 28 Oct. It will be archived on 4 Nov unless new coverage appears.
New developments are added here, newest first. When the headline, summary or other sections change, the earlier version is kept under “See earlier version”.
Headline before this update: Delhi AQI stays 'moderate' at 191; minister cites 'war mode'
Summary before this update: CPCB data showed Delhi's AQI at 190 at 8 am on Saturday and 191 at 4 pm, in the 'moderate' category, down from 223 to 230 on Friday (figures differ by outlet). Several areas stayed 'poor', and one outlet had reported a forecast that the AQI could reach 310-320 during the day, though the 4 pm reading stayed near 191. Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa said the Delhi government is working in 'war mode' and said the October 23 AQI was lower than in 2025 and 2024.
Note before this update: Outlets report the same CPCB readings and GRAP steps; one carries a 'very poor' forecast and one carries the minister's comparison with earlier years.
“What's missing” before this update:
Based on 6 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 4 of 15 (Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Republic, Times Now).
Outlets use the same CPCB readings and GRAP steps; the newer reports add Wednesday's rise and farm-fire data, which carry different emphases.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Routine air quality data report with CPCB readings, GRAP Stage-I measures and local quotes; no ideological framing or government praise or criticism.
Why: Routine air quality update with AQI figures and GRAP measures; no ideological framing on religion, social justice or statism, and no criticism or praise of government.
Why: Routine air quality report with CPCB readings, resident comments and GRAP measures. No religion, social justice or statism framing, and no judgement of government action.
Why: Routine air quality and weather report with CPCB and IMD data; the minister's quote is relayed without praise or critique, and no ideological dimension is touched.
Why: Routine report of Delhi air quality, temperature and farm-fire satellite data with no policy or ideological framing; figures are attributed to CPCB, IMD, NASA and iFOREST.
Why: Routine air quality report citing CPCB data and forecasts. It has no policy, identity or welfare framing and gives no verdict on government action, so it is not ideological.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.
How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.
Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.
Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.
Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.
Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.