The Delhi High Court on Monday stayed, on an interim basis, JNU's 9 October order dismissing professor and Congress MP Bimol Akoijam, issued notice to the university and listed the case for January. The dismissal followed complaints by women students and an internal committee inquiry.
Akoijam denies the allegations, and Delhi Police has registered an FIR and says its probe continues.
Why it matters: The case involves a central university, an opposition MP and the handling of sexual harassment complaints on campus, so it bears on how institutions apply due process.
This matter is before the courts or under investigation. Nazariya reports what was said and alleged; it does not decide guilt or the outcome.
Based on 6 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 3 of 15 (Aaj Tak, Republic, Dainik Bhaskar). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
All four outlets report the stay in a neutral tone and differ mainly in which details they include, so there is no real split in framing.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Court-order report gives large space to ABVP's 'Congress-Left ecosystem' attack on a Congress MP, tilting right on security/anti-national-style framing of opponents; little ideological policy content otherwise.
Why: A court-stay report on a sexual harassment dismissal; it touches no ideological dimension. It gives both the MP's claims and the JNU and police account, with no loaded framing.
Why: Reports a court stay on a professor's dismissal amid sexual harassment allegations. No clear policy or ideological framing; both allegations and his denial are given, so stance toward Union govt is neutral.
Why: Court-stay report on a sexual harassment dismissal; no religion, social justice or statism angle. Plain account with both the university's order and the professor's denial.
Why: Court-stay report on a university sexual harassment dismissal of an opposition MP; no ideological dimension is engaged, and both the allegations and Akoijam's denial are reported evenly.
Why: Plain report of a court interim order in a sexual harassment dismissal case; no caste, religion, security or economic-policy framing, and no loaded wording or slant.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Sport results skip winding down and are archived after about 2 days, unless police or a court are involved. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.
How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.
Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.
Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.
Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.
Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.