Latest: Supreme Court limits Diwali firecrackers to three hours as Delhi air stays very poor
Delhi's AQI was reported at 373 to 377 on Wednesday morning, with 20 or 21 of 59 stations in the 'severe' category. The Centre's early warning system forecast 'very poor' air until at least 6 November, Stage II of GRAP remains in force, and one outlet reports the Supreme Court has allowed only three hours of low-emission firecrackers ahead of Diwali. Summary updated 4 Nov, 18:42 IST
Why it matters: Millions of people across Delhi-NCR are breathing unhealthy air, and the pollution curbs and the approach of Diwali affect daily life and health.
New developments are added here, newest first. When the headline, summary or other sections change, the earlier version is kept under “See earlier version”.
Summary before this update: Delhi's AQI was reported at 373 to 377 on Wednesday morning, with 20 or 21 of 59 stations in the 'severe' category. The Centre's early warning system forecast 'very poor' air until at least 6 November, and Stage II of GRAP remains in force.
Note before this update: Outlets broadly agree on the pollution picture, but two reports cite a 605 AQI figure that others do not, and station readings vary slightly.
“What's missing” before this update:
Based on 6 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 4 of 15 (Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Aaj Tak, Republic).
Outlets broadly agree on the pollution picture, but two reports cite a 605 AQI figure that others do not, and station and source readings vary.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Data-driven pollution report with AQI readings, forecasts and farm fire counts. No religion, social justice or statism framing, and no clear criticism or praise of any government.
Why: Factual air-quality report with station readings and GRAP status. No religion, social justice or statism framing, and no explicit praise or blame of government.
Why: Weather and pollution report with no policy or identity angle; relays CPCB data and routine GRAP measures without praising or criticising the government.
Why: Mostly an AQI data report with a minister's comments on monitoring; no clear ideological framing. It notes questions about effectiveness, but the tone stays balanced and factual.
Why: Routine air-quality data report citing CPCB figures; no policy, identity or welfare framing, and no blame placed on any government.
Why: Pollution report on Delhi and Lahore air quality with no clear ideological angle; the 'नापाक' headline pun is mild. Reports government steps without praise or criticism.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Sport results skip winding down and are archived after about 2 days, unless police or a court are involved. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.
How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.
Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.
Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.
Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.
Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.