FSSAI has published a draft amendment to the Foods for Infant Nutrition Regulations that would bar added sucrose and fructose in foods for infants up to six months. The draft was gazetted on 16 October and stakeholders have 60 days to send objections and suggestions before final rules.
Why it matters: Parents and the packaged baby food industry in India would be affected, as current rules allow limited added sugars in infant products.
Based on 6 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 3 of 15 (Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
All six articles report the proposal in a neutral way; they differ mainly in added context such as the Cerelac probe, obesity data, labelling push and doctors' comments.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Plain report of a draft health regulation on infant food sugar; no religion, identity, social justice or statism angle. Reports ministry announcement with a doctor's welcome and no editorialising.
Why: Plain report of a regulatory proposal on infant food sugars. No religion, identity, social-justice or statist-versus-market framing; neutral on government.
Why: Plain report of a draft food-safety regulation on infant nutrition. It touches no religion, social justice or statism dimension, and relays the official release without praise or criticism.
Why: Plain report of a regulator's draft health rule on infant food. It touches no religion, social justice or statism dimension, and carries no framing for or against the government.
Why: Plain report of draft food safety rules on infant sugar and tea pesticide limits; no religion, identity, social justice or statism framing. Doctors' comments are advisory, not partisan.
Why: A regulatory explainer on infant nutrition standards with no religion, identity, social justice or statism angle. It relays the FSSAI proposal plainly, without praise or criticism of government.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.