Nelson Dilipkumar's Jailer 2, starring Rajinikanth, opened worldwide on 15 October in about 1,000 theatres across Tamil Nadu. Reviews range from a 4/5 rating to a pan, and one report puts its first-day India collection at Rs 59.70 crore, citing Sacnilk.
Why it matters: A big box-office test for Tamil cinema this festive season.
Based on 15 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 3 of 15 (India Today, Aaj Tak, Republic). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
No political divide; coverage differs on the film's quality, and only one article reports box-office numbers, which do not add up.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Negative review that criticises how the film portrays women. It is cultural criticism with no government or policy angle.
Why: Mixed film review. Not ideological.
Why: Positive 3.5/5 review. Not ideological.
Why: Positive 4/5 review. Not ideological.
Why: Box-office report citing Sacnilk. Its own totals do not reconcile, and the overseas figure has no source.
Why: Short wire piece on fan celebrations on release day. Not ideological.
Why: Entertainment write-up praising the visuals while noting Sai Pallavi's limited screen time. No policy angle.
Why: Promotional piece built on fan posts. Not ideological.
Why: Wire report of an actor's views on the title and VFX. It is cultural comment with no policy angle.
Why: Entertainment piece on a film trailer and promotional video; no policy, government or social-justice angle, so not ideological.
Why: Box office report on a film with no policy, religion, social justice or state-role angle. It is a plain recitation of Sacnilk collection figures.
Why: Box office collection report with no policy, religion, social justice or economic-policy angle, so it is not ideological and has no government stance.
Why: Box office report on a film's earnings with no policy, religion, social justice or state-role angle, so it is not ideological and has no government stance.
Why: Box office report on a film with no policy, religion, social justice or state-role angle, so it is not ideological and has no government stance.
Why: A box office report on overseas collections of a Tamil film, with no policy, religion, social justice or statism angle and no government angle.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.