Maharashtra ATS arrested a man in Mahim, Mumbai, over alleged links to the banned Jaish-e-Mohammed and registered a case under BNS Section 196(1). Outlets differ on whether any Pakistan link exists, with Hindustan Times reporting the ATS found none.
Why it matters: The case involves a banned terror group, alleged threats against the Prime Minister and online radicalisation, which raise security and free-speech questions.
Archived on 1 Nov. No new coverage for 7 days. The summary, scores and article list are frozen as they stood, scored with rubric version 1. How it ended: outcome check pending. If new coverage appears, the story reopens with an update.
This matter is before the courts or under investigation. Nazariya reports what was said and alleged; it does not decide guilt or the outcome.
Based on 8 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 4 of 15 (Hindustan Times, Times Now, Dainik Bhaskar, Jagran).
Most outlets relay ATS claims neutrally. Dainik Jagran frames them more firmly, and only Hindustan Times reports the ATS found no Pakistan link.
Why: Plain crime report relaying ATS claims with 'alleged' hedging; security framing and reliance on agency sources, but no editorialising or loaded language of its own.
Why: Police-sourced crime report on a security case; mild security framing, but headline notes no Pakistan link. No loaded language or other voices, so near centre.
Why: Police-sourced terror arrest report in neutral tone, with a security framing and no loaded language. Mild security lean, but the swap test shows little partisan signal.
Why: Police-sourced terror arrest report relayed uncritically, stressing security threat and ATS claims; no defence or civil-liberties voices. Mild security-leaning framing, but largely factual and not explicitly hawkish.
Why: Police-sourced terror arrest report relying only on ATS claims; stresses security threat and Pakistan links with no defence voice, a mild security-hawkish lean. No explicit praise or criticism of government.
Why: Security-focused crime report relying on ATS claims with hedged wording ('allegedly'), but no accused or defence voice; terror and national-security framing gives a mild right lean.
Why: Headline and lead present ATS allegations as established fact ('terror plot busted', 'linked to Pakistani intelligence'), with no defence voice. Security-hawkish framing of a Muslim accused; one neighbour quote adds slight balance.
Why: Security-focused crime report relying on police claims and 'suspected' framing; includes a neighbour's view. Mild lean from unchallenged terror-link allegations and 'cover' narrative, without loaded editorialising.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.
How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.
Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.
Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.
Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.
Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.