India's Ministry of External Affairs on Monday rejected references to India in resolutions adopted at the OIC foreign ministers' session in Baghdad on October 17-18. It called them malicious, biased and false, said Pakistan orchestrated them and said the OIC has no standing on India's internal matters.
Why it matters: The statement shows how India responds to international criticism on Kashmir and its dealings with Pakistan and the Muslim-majority bloc of states.
Based on 4 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 3 of 15 (Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Aaj Tak). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
All four articles relay the MEA statement almost wholly in official voice; they differ mainly in tone, with Aaj Tak's headline the most triumphal.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Relays MEA's hawkish national-interest line on Kashmir, Article 370 and Pakistan almost wholly in official voice, with no Kashmiri, OIC or Pakistani response. Framing is state-aligned but largely reportorial.
Why: Relays MEA's hawkish national-security and sovereignty framing on Kashmir and Pakistan without other voices, though largely a plain report of an official statement, so ideology leans right and stance stays neutral.
Why: Relays MEA's hawkish rebuttal with no outside voices; headline's 'धोया' (thrashed) is triumphal. Kashmir integral-part, Article 370 development and anti-Pakistan framing lean right on national security.
Why: Relays MEA's hawkish rebuttal on Kashmir and Pakistan almost entirely in the ministry's words, with no OIC or Pakistan response; national-security framing and one-sided sourcing lean right and pro-government.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.