NazariyaEvery side of the story. You decide.
LiveCourts & Law· Updated 19 OctLimited coverageBefore the courts

Meerut court sentences woman, lover to death over husband's staged snakebite murder

A Meerut court sentenced Ravita and Amardeep to death for the April 2025 murder of her husband Amit Kashyap, after convicting both of murder and criminal conspiracy. Police and prosecutors say the post-mortem showed strangulation, not snakebite, and the sentences need High Court confirmation.

Why it matters: The verdict follows another Meerut death sentence days earlier in the 'blue drum' case, and both cases have drawn wide national attention to crimes involving spouses and lovers.

Based on 4 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.

Large outlets read: 3 of 15 (Hindustan Times, Republic, Zee News). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.

Left-leaningCentreRight-leaning
+ 4 Not ideological
CriticalNeutralSupportive
Ideology · 4 articles
Left-leaning 0Centre 0Right-leaning 0Not ideological 4
Stance · Uttar Pradesh govt
Critical 0Neutral 4Supportive 0
What's missing: None of the reports say whether the convicted pair will appeal or when the High Court will review the death sentences.

What everyone agrees on

  • A Meerut court sentenced Ravita and her lover Amardeep to death for the murder of her husband, Amit Kashyap. 1 2 3 4
  • The post-mortem found Kashyap died of strangulation or asphyxia, not a snakebite, according to the reports. 1 2 3 4
  • Prosecutors and police say a snake was placed near the body to make the death look accidental. 1 2 3 4
  • The verdict came shortly after another Meerut court sentenced Muskan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla to death in the 'blue drum' case. 1 2 3

How the coverage differs

Coverage broadly agrees on the verdict and the strangulation finding; outlets differ mainly in which investigative details they stress.

  • Investigation details: call records showing 51 calls within 24 hours, and an alleged Rs 1,000 snake purchase, are reported by one outlet. 1
  • Medical and forensic evidence: injury marks on the neck and nose, and fractures of the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage, are cited as signs of strangulation. 2 4
  • Court process: conviction on 7 October, the Additional District Judge-12 court, 87 hearings over 551 days, and the need for High Court confirmation. 1 3 4

Where they disagree

No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.

What's missing

  • Appeal status: None of the articles say whether the convicted pair plan to appeal or when the High Court will take up confirmation. 1 2 3 4
  • Motive: The articles do not set out the motive the prosecution presented in court. 1 2 3 4
  • Defence case: Only one outlet mentions the defence arguments, saying via a lawyer that they were set aside; the arguments themselves are not described. 2
  • Snake details: The removed venom sac and the alleged purchase of the snake are each reported by only one outlet, with no independent confirmation. 1 3

The articles

Neutral
1 · Zee NewsConfidence: High
Days after ‘blue drum’ verdict, Meerut court sentences woman, lover to death for husband’s murder
Official statementOfficial sources only
This article:

Why: A crime and court-verdict report with no policy, religion-politics, social justice or statism angle; it relays police and court findings without any stance toward government.

2 · Hindustan TimesConfidence: High
Meerut woman, lover sentenced to death for killing husband, leaving snake on bed to fake accident
This article:

Why: A crime and court-verdict report with no policy, identity, or governance angle, so it touches none of the ideology dimensions. Sourcing is police, PTI and a prosecution lawyer, with neutral wording.

3 · The WeekConfidence: High
Meerut woman, lover get death penalty for staging husband's murder as snakebite
This article:

Why: A straight crime and court report with no policy, religion, social-justice or statism angle and no government framing, so it is not ideological.

4 · RepublicConfidence: High
Meerut Court Sentences Woman, Lover To Death For Framing Husband's Strangulation As Snakebite
This article:

Why: A plain crime and court-verdict report with no policy, identity, security-law or welfare angle. Dramatic wording like 'cold-blooded' is about the crime, not ideology, and there is no government angle.

How we score

Ideology score, −10 to +10

Left-leaning (−10 to −3)
Secular-pluralist framing, minority protection, caste justice and voter access, civil liberties, an active state.
Centre (−2 to +2)
Several positions represented fairly, neutral language, reporting kept apart from opinion.
Right-leaning (+3 to +10)
Cultural nationalism, national strength and security, scepticism of group-based policy, voter-roll integrity, market-led growth.

Stance toward the government

Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.

The swap test

If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.

Confidence

High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.

Limited coverage and blindspots

Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.

Not ideological

Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.

How often the feed refreshes

This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:

Wires and the top 20 outletschecked every 5 minutes
All other outletschecked every 15 minutes
New storygoes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage
Live storiesnew articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly
Home page orderevery 15 minutes

Updates are added, never rewritten

New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.

Live, winding down, archived

A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.

Large outlets missing

NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.

Who is accountable

Editor and grievance officer

Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.

Funding and ownership

[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.

Appeals

Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].

Rules we follow

No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.

Corrections log

  • 16 Oct · Goregaon toddler death: removed the building's name and an unverified claim about the 10-year-old's health, to protect the child's identity.
  • 16 Oct · India–US trade deal: merged two duplicate story pages into one.
  • 16 Oct · INS Mangrol: one report names the commissioning officer differently from three others; flagged in the story, not resolved.