NazariyaEvery side of the story. You decide.
LivePolitics & Elections· Updated 2 NovLimited coverage

'Modi nahi jayenge' chant heard at PM's Gujarat event

Chants of 'Modi nahi jayenge' were heard during PM Narendra Modi's visit to Banaskantha, Gujarat, where he launched projects worth over Rs 14,000 crore and released the 24th PM-KISAN instalment. Congress leader Pawan Khera replied 'You wish!', and Modi separately attacked unnamed critics for spreading rumours, according to one outlet.

Why it matters: The visit combined a large welfare payout to farmers and new infrastructure with a political exchange between the PM and the Congress.

Based on 3 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.

Large outlets read: 2 of 15 (Times of India, Aaj Tak). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.

What's missing: No outlet says who the chanting women were or what they meant by the slogan.

What everyone agrees on

  • PM Modi was in Banaskantha, Gujarat, where he inaugurated and laid foundation stones for projects worth over Rs 14,000 crore. 1 2 3
  • He released the 24th instalment of PM-KISAN, reported as Rs 19,000 crore. 1 2 3
  • The projects include Ahmedabad Metro expansion and 4,030 new Anganwadi centres. 1 3

How each side sees it

Two outlets report the chant and projects in neutral terms, while one outlet leads with Modi's attack on critics and carries no opposition reply.

Critical of the government
No coverage from this side among the articles we read.
Neutral
Report the 'Modi nahi jayenge' chant as an event moment alongside the list of projects and welfare payouts, without comment on its meaning. 1 Frame the chant as part of a political exchange, noting Congress leader Pawan Khera's 'You wish!' reply and Mallikarjun Kharge's earlier remark in Patna. 3
Supportive of the government
Lead with Modi's attack on unnamed critics, whom he accused of spreading rumours about fertiliser and gas supply during the Iran and Gulf war. The report carries no opposition reply. 2

Where they disagree

  1. Setting of the chant: was it during a group photograph with women, or while Modi interacted with students? 1 3
  2. What the story is about: is it the slogan and Congress's response, or Modi's accusation that critics spread rumours? 1 2 3

What's missing

  • Who chanted and why: no outlet quotes the women or says what the chant meant to them. 1 3
  • Evidence for the rumour claim: no outlet checks Modi's statements on fertiliser prices and gas supply against official data. 2
  • Opposition reply to Modi's speech: the coverage of his remarks includes no response from the critics he referred to. 2

The articles

Centre
1 · Free Press JournalConfidence: Medium
Women Chant 'Modi Nahi Jayenge' During Prime Minister's Banaskantha Visit | Video
This article:

Why: Plain report of a PM event with development projects and welfare payouts; mostly neutral, with mild state-led and farmer-welfare content and no loaded language.

3 · Times of IndiaConfidence: Medium
'Modi nahi jayenge' slogan raised at PM's Gujarat event; Congress retorts, 'you wish!'
This article:

Why: Mostly a political-barbs report plus a neutral list of development projects; touches welfare and agriculture spending lightly, with no clear ideological framing or loaded wording.

Right-leaning
2 · Aaj Tak · HindiConfidence: Medium
'ये अफरातफरी फैलाना चाहते थे, ताकि मोदी को बदनाम कर सकें', PM का प्रहार
This article:

Why: Relays Modi's attack on unnamed critics as rumour-mongers hurting the nation, with national-unity framing and farmer-scheme praise. No opposition reply; sourcing is one-sided, so the lean is mildly right.

How we score

Ideology score, −10 to +10

Left-leaning (−10 to −3)
Secular-pluralist framing, minority protection, caste justice and voter access, civil liberties, an active state.
Centre (−2 to +2)
Several positions represented fairly, neutral language, reporting kept apart from opinion.
Right-leaning (+3 to +10)
Cultural nationalism, national strength and security, scepticism of group-based policy, voter-roll integrity, market-led growth.

Stance toward the government

Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.

The swap test

If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.

Confidence

High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.

Limited coverage and blindspots

Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.

Not ideological

Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.

How often the feed refreshes

This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:

Wires and the top 20 outletschecked every 5 minutes
All other outletschecked every 15 minutes
New storygoes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage
Live storiesnew articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly
Home page orderevery 15 minutes

Updates are added, never rewritten

New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.

Live, winding down, archived

A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.

Large outlets missing

NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.

Who is accountable

Editor and grievance officer

Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.

How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.

Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.

Funding and ownership

Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.

Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.

Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.

Appeals

Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.

Rules we follow

No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.

Corrections log

  • 16 Oct · Goregaon toddler death: removed the building's name and an unverified claim about the 10-year-old's health, to protect the child's identity.
  • 16 Oct · India–US trade deal: merged two duplicate story pages into one.
  • 16 Oct · INS Mangrol: one report names the commissioning officer differently from three others; flagged in the story, not resolved.