NazariyaEvery side of the story. You decide.
LiveSports· Updated 2 NovLimited coverage

New Zealand beat India by seven wickets in fifth T20I

New Zealand chased India's 191 for eight with 12 balls to spare at Seddon Park, Hamilton, led by Tim Seifert's 93 and Glenn Phillips' unbeaten 65. India still won the five-match series 3-2.

Why it matters: Indian cricket fans follow the national team's T20I results closely, and the series win shows how the side performed across all five matches.

Based on 3 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.

Large outlets read: 0 of 15. Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.

What's missing: Reports give few details on India's bowling in the chase or why the two changes were made.

What everyone agrees on

  • New Zealand beat India by seven wickets in the fifth T20I at Seddon Park, Hamilton. 2 3
  • India made 191 for eight, with Ishan Kishan scoring 61 and captain Shreyas Iyer 50. 2 3
  • Tim Seifert scored 93 and Glenn Phillips stayed unbeaten on 65 as New Zealand chased the target. 2 3
  • India had already sealed the series and finished with a 3-2 win. 1 2 3

How the coverage differs

All three outlets report the match the same way and differ only in which details they highlight.

  • Match report: Seifert and Phillips' 86-run stand and Adam Milne's 4 for 19 decided the result. 2 3
  • Record angle: Phillips ended the series with 341 runs, the most in a bilateral T20I series, according to one outlet. 2
  • Toss and selection: Santner won the toss and bowled first, India made two changes, and Vaibhav Sooryavanshi stayed on the bench. 1

Where they disagree

No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.

What's missing

  • Indian bowling: The reports give little detail on how India's bowlers performed in the chase. 2 3
  • Team changes: No outlet explains why India dropped Mayank Yadav and Axar Patel for the finale. 1
  • Record check: Phillips' series run record is reported by only one outlet, with no comparison table. 2

The articles

Not ideological
1 · Telangana TodayConfidence: High
Mitchell Santner wins first toss of series as India bat in final T20I
This article:

Why: A cricket toss and team-selection report with no policy, religion, social justice or state-role angle, so it is not ideological and carries no stance toward any government.

2 · The Morung ExpressConfidence: High
5th T20I: Seifert, record-breaking Phillips help NZ beat India in Hamilton
This article:

Why: Cricket match report with no policy, religion, social justice or state-role angle, so it is not ideological and has no government stance.

3 · Telangana TodayConfidence: High
India suffer seven-wicket defeat against New Zealand in series finale
This article:

Why: A cricket match report with no policy, religion, security, social justice or statism angle, so it is not ideological and has no government stance.

How we score

Ideology score, −10 to +10

Left-leaning (−10 to −3)
Secular-pluralist framing, minority protection, caste justice and voter access, civil liberties, an active state.
Centre (−2 to +2)
Several positions represented fairly, neutral language, reporting kept apart from opinion.
Right-leaning (+3 to +10)
Cultural nationalism, national strength and security, scepticism of group-based policy, voter-roll integrity, market-led growth.

Stance toward the government

Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.

The swap test

If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.

Confidence

High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.

Limited coverage and blindspots

Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.

Not ideological

Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.

How often the feed refreshes

This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:

Wires and the top 20 outletschecked every 5 minutes
All other outletschecked every 15 minutes
New storygoes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage
Live storiesnew articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly
Home page orderevery 15 minutes

Updates are added, never rewritten

New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.

Live, winding down, archived

A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.

Large outlets missing

NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.

Who is accountable

Editor and grievance officer

Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.

How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.

Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.

Funding and ownership

Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.

Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.

Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.

Appeals

Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.

Rules we follow

No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.

Corrections log

  • 16 Oct · Goregaon toddler death: removed the building's name and an unverified claim about the 10-year-old's health, to protect the child's identity.
  • 16 Oct · India–US trade deal: merged two duplicate story pages into one.
  • 16 Oct · INS Mangrol: one report names the commissioning officer differently from three others; flagged in the story, not resolved.