Latest: Odisha announces special relief package for families hit by Cyclone Arnab floods
Odisha Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi announced 50 kg rice and Rs 2,500 for every family hit by Cyclone Arnab floods, with farm input subsidy, Rs 1.20 lakh to Rs 1.30 lakh for fully damaged houses and compensation for shops. He said the package will be reviewed after damage from another cyclonic storm expected to hit Andhra Pradesh is assessed.
Earlier reports put the toll at five to six, with 10 to 11 missing after a landslide at Gidipabali, while Navy and Coast Guard helicopters airdrop food in Ganjam and a central team was due on November 2. Summary updated 2 Nov, 14:00 IST
Why it matters: Deaths, missing people and flooding across coastal and hill districts of Odisha affect lakhs of people, and the compensation announced shapes how quickly families and farmers recover.
New developments are added here, newest first. When the headline, summary or other sections change, the earlier version is kept under “See earlier version”.
Headline before this update: Cyclone Arnab toll in Odisha rises to six, 10 missing
Summary before this update: Cyclone Arnab's rain flooded villages in Ganjam and Gajapati and set off landslides, and officials put the death toll at five to six, with 10 to 11 people missing after a landslide at Gidipabali. The state has sanctioned Rs 20 crore extra for Ganjam and announced Rs 4 lakh ex gratia for each family. Navy and Coast Guard helicopters are airdropping food, 177 personnel are searching the debris, and a central team will visit on November 2.
Note before this update: All eight outlets report official accounts in a neutral tone. They differ on the toll, the number missing, the affected figures and how much weight the opposition's criticism gets.
“What's missing” before this update:
Based on 11 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 6 of 15 (Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, India Today, Aaj Tak, ABP).
All nine outlets report official accounts in a neutral tone. They differ on the toll, the number missing, the affected figures and how much weight the opposition's criticism gets.
Why: Plain report of a state relief package; welfare compensation to farmers, fishers, weavers and poor households gives a slight state-led lean, but no loaded framing or criticism.
Why: A plain report of a state relief package. It leans slightly towards welfare and state-led relief, with a small tilt to the right from the eligibility and no-delay framing. There is no opposition voice and no loaded language.
Why: Disaster-response report with no ideological angle; relays minister's figures and rescue details without praise or criticism of the government.
Why: Disaster relief report with no ideological framing; it relays official updates on rescue operations and flood damage, with a brief mention of Congress demands. Tone is plain and factual.
Why: Disaster relief report with no ideological framing; relays officials' accounts of rescue efforts and rainfall without praise or criticism of the state government.
Why: Disaster report on cyclone flooding and relief efforts; no ideological dimension is touched. Coverage relays official statements neutrally with no praise or criticism of the government.
Why: PTI wire report on cyclone floods and relief; no ideological dimension. Balanced mix of government claims and brief opposition criticism, so stance is neutral toward the state government.
Why: Disaster report on cyclone deaths and rescue operations, with no religion, identity, social justice or statist policy angle. Even-handed tone and sourcing from officials, survivors and the opposition.
Why: Disaster-relief update relying on state minister and relief commissioner; no ideological framing on religion, social justice or statism. Plain reporting of official figures and response.
Why: Disaster report on cyclone landslide deaths and rescue work, with no policy or ideological angle. Reports official statements and the opposition's concern without blame or praise.
Why: Disaster relief report relaying the CM's package announcement; no religion, identity or social-justice framing, and welfare is routine relief. Plain official-event report, so Neutral toward the state government.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.
How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.
Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.
Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.
Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.
Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.