A Supreme Court bench of Justices MM Sundresh and PB Varale set aside the Calcutta High Court's 23 February 2026 order and granted bail to Sandip Ghosh. It noted he had spent over two years in custody and only 7 of 147 witnesses had been examined.
Why it matters: The order concerns the former head of a Kolkata medical college whose institution became a national flashpoint, and it shows how the Supreme Court weighs long pre-trial custody in a corruption case.
This matter is before the courts or under investigation. Nazariya reports what was said and alleged; it does not decide guilt or the outcome.
Based on 8 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 5 of 15 (Hindustan Times, The Hindu, India Today, Aaj Tak, Times Now).
All four outlets report the order in near-identical terms with no ideological framing; they differ only slightly on which charges they list.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Reports criticism of the CBI over a bail order and delayed trial. No religion, identity, social-justice or economic-policy angle, so not ideological. Voices are critical of the central agency.
Why: Reports a party protest over a bail decision and probe lapses. It has no religion, social-justice or economic policy angle. Only Congress is quoted, so the stance leans critical of central agencies.
Why: Plain report of a Supreme Court bail order on a corruption case, citing court language and PTI. No religion, social justice or statism angle, and no framing toward any government.
Why: Plain report of a court bail order in a corruption case; no ideological framing, loaded language or government criticism or praise.
Why: Plain report of a court bail order in a corruption case; no ideological framing, loaded language or government-directed slant, and it relies on the court's own words.
Why: Plain court report on bail for a corruption accused; no religion, social justice or statism framing, and no pro- or anti-government slant in wording or sourcing.
Why: Plain report of a Supreme Court bail order in a corruption case, with no ideological framing or government-leaning language; it touches none of the scoring dimensions.
Why: Reports a bail order and reactions from the victim's father, doctors and a BJP leader. It has no clear religion, social justice or statism angle, and no side is favoured.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.