Latest: Police plan crime scene recreation with a dummy as family alleges murder and Dubey claims suicide
Police in Lucknow are preparing a crime scene recreation with a forensic team, dropping a dummy matching Shiva Sharma's build from the fourth floor and comparing the fall with scene evidence and the postmortem report. Sharma, a cafe operator, died on 9 October; his mother filed a case against Shraddha Dubey and her sister Rashmi, and the family alleges murder, while Dubey said in a video before her arrest that it was suicide.
A Lucknow court rejected bail for Dubey, Rashmi and driver Tanveer Ali alias Danish and sent Dubey to 10 days of judicial custody, and police allege her boyfriend Aamir helped her flee. Summary updated 28 Oct, 18:26 IST
Why it matters: A death in a Lucknow building, with a murder allegation, a cross-state hunt and a disputed suicide claim, tests how police establish what happened.
Winding down: no new coverage since 28 Oct. It will be archived on 4 Nov unless new coverage appears.
This matter is before the courts or under investigation. Nazariya reports what was said and alleged; it does not decide guilt or the outcome.
New developments are added here, newest first. When the headline, summary or other sections change, the earlier version is kept under “See earlier version”.
Headline before this update: Lucknow court denies bail to Shraddha Dubey, sister, driver
Summary before this update: After a Nagpur court gave UP Police transit remand, Shraddha Dubey was brought to Lucknow, where a CJM court rejected bail pleas of Dubey, her sister Rashmi and driver Tanveer Ali alias Danish, and sent Dubey to 10 days of judicial custody. Businessman Shiva Sharma died after falling from a Lucknow flat on 9 October, and police allege her boyfriend Aamir helped her flee; police are also reportedly examining her finances.
Note before this update: Coverage is factual and largely agrees; outlets differ mainly in whether they focus on the arrest, the escape route, the court process or the accused's lifestyle.
“What's missing” before this update:
Based on 5 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 1 of 15 (Aaj Tak). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
Coverage is factual and largely agrees; outlets differ in whether they focus on the arrest, the escape route, the court process, the accused's finances or the murder-or-suicide question.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Crime investigation report on a fugitive's arrest and helpers, with no policy, religion-politics, social justice or statism angle; no government framing, so Neutral.
Why: A crime investigation report on an arrest and escape route, with no policy, religion-politics or welfare angle. The burqa mention is factual and unframed. No government stance.
Why: Plain crime report on arrests and transit remand in a Lucknow death case; no religion, social justice or statism angle, and no framing of government.
Why: A crime story about an influencer's arrest and lifestyle, with no policy, religion, social-justice or statism angle, and no government framing. The tone is sensational but not ideological.
Why: A crime investigation report on a businessman's death in Lucknow, with no religion, security-law, social-justice or economic-policy angle. It describes police procedure neutrally.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.
How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.
Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.
Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.
Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.
Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.