More than 400 Indian-origin students, researchers and alumni from 27 countries signed a statement titled 'Spare India from Anarchy', circulated on Monday. It condemns attempts to undermine constitutional institutions through street protests and urges debate within those institutions, and one outlet notes it does not name the Election Commission or the SIR exercise.
Why it matters: The statement enters the debate over protests against the Election Commission's voter-roll revision and over trust in institutions such as the poll body and courts.
Why it matters: How India's voter rolls are revised decides who can vote in 2027; the dispute has moved from the Election Commission to the courts, the streets and diplomacy.
Based on 6 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 4 of 15 (Times of India, India Today, ABP, Jagran).
All six articles lean Supportive of the government and relay the statement with no protester or opposition voice, so coverage differs mainly in emphasis.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Amplifies a statement framing anti-EC protests as 'anarchy' against institutions, with no opposition or protester voices. Echoes establishment, order-first line; mild right tilt on national-institutions framing.
Why: Reports an establishment-leaning scholars' appeal against anti-EC protests, giving its framing most space and little voice to protest side; echoes 'anarchy' and trust-in-institutions framing, though it notes the lack of naming.
Why: Amplifies a statement framing anti-SIR protests as anarchy, with only one side quoted and loaded words like 'उपद्रवी' and 'अराजक'. Backs institutions and order over critics; no protester or opposition voice.
Why: Relays a statement defending institutions like the Election Commission and judiciary against opposition protests, with no opposition voice; framing of 'anarchy' and 'election denial' echoes the government line.
Why: IANS copy relays one-sided statement condemning opposition street protests against SIR/EC as 'anarchic'; no opposition voice. Frames critics as threats to institutions, leaning right on security and order.
Why: Relays a statement condemning street protests and 'anarchist forces' as undermining institutions, with no protester or opposition voice. This leans toward a national-security, order-first framing and sides with the government.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.