Why it matters: How India's voter rolls are revised decides who can vote in 2027; the dispute has moved from the Election Commission to the courts, the streets and diplomacy.
An issue page never closes. When a story goes quiet it stays here on the timeline, with its link unchanged, so the whole record of coverage stays in one place.
Delhi Police detained CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke and AISA president Neha Bora on 16 October on their way to the 'Lehra Do Tiranga' march at Connaught Place, citing Section 163 BNSS orders. Bora was released early Saturday and Dipke, arrested under BNSS Sections 126 and 170 for an alleged breach of an earlier peace bond, was freed on a one-year peace bond, with at least three FIRs reported. On Sunday 18 October the bail hearing of co-convenors Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka was delayed after the magistrate reported a threat and an FIR was registered; CJP alleged deliberate delay and four rejected sureties, while police called the sureties faulty and denied delay. A Supreme Court plea on Section 163 orders is listed for 19 November, and the political row has widened, with Congress leaders Chidambaram and Sibal rejecting Rajnath Singh's 'regime change' charge.
Latest: Chidambaram and Sibal reject Rajnath Singh's 'regime change' charge; Das-Ranka hearing row continues
The Election Commission has directed 17 states and Union Territories to carry out a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls with 1 January 2027 as the qualifying date, and will give recognised parties readable versions of the rolls at draft and final stages. Congress's Jairam Ramesh has demanded the removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar and suspension of the SIR, while an EC functionary called the revision an annual exercise under election law. Problems with the SIR lists continue to surface: a civil society audit in two Okhla booths in Delhi found at least 100 voters wrongly marked absent, shifted, dead or duplicate, Maharashtra's Chief Electoral Officer has asked for Form 6 to be amended for deleted voters, and Goa Forward chief Vijai Sardesai has alleged wrongful additions and transfers. Uttar Pradesh began its drive on 17 October, and one supportive outlet says the SIR has not been abandoned.
Latest: Delhi public audit finds 100+ voters wrongly marked absent, shifted or dead in two Okhla booths
Actor Imran Khan, a US citizen and OCI cardholder, moved the Bombay High Court on October 17 against an FRRO notice dated October 14 directing him to leave India by October 28, after he attended an October 10 protest at August Kranti Maidan demanding the Chief Election Commissioner's resignation. His petition says the notice gave no reasons, named no violation and allowed no hearing, and cites Articles 14 and 21; his lawyer is likely to mention it for urgent hearing on October 19. The FRRO has separately asked why his OCI card should not be cancelled, with 15 days to reply. Union Minister Chirag Paswan has backed the action, while film figures are split.
Latest: Khan's petition likely to be mentioned October 19; FRRO's OCI cancellation reply due within 15 days
A DMK parliamentary party meeting chaired by M.K. Stalin in Chennai demanded the removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, cancellation of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and a return to ballot papers. The party also backed protests by students and the Cockroach Janata Party and criticised Congress and TVK, and DMK MPs plan to petition the President.
Rajnath Singh said in Lucknow that the Congress and its allies want Bangladesh-style regime change and are using youth energy to spread anarchy. Kapil Sibal replied on X that people, not the Congress, want change, and accused the government of capturing institutions and manipulating voter lists.
At a Margao rally closing Congress's 27-day Goy Rakhon Yatra, Rahul Gandhi alleged that Modi plans, Shah operationalises and CEC Gyanesh Kumar implements 'vote theft', and said all three would face justice. One outlet reports a BJP reply from Keshav Prasad Maurya, who cited the Emergency against Congress; most other reports carry no BJP or Election Commission response.
Six US Democratic lawmakers, including Pramila Jayapal, Ilhan Omar and James McGovern, wrote to Secretary of State Marco Rubio on 16 October asking him to raise alleged excessive force against student protesters, alleged surveillance of supporters by Indian missions in the US, and voter-roll deletions, and to review India's eligibility for arms sales. India's external affairs ministry and ambassador Vinay Mohan Kwatra rejected the remarks as interference in internal affairs, critics questioned the signatories' neutrality, and the Election Commission said the revision verifies eligibility and deleted voters can re-enrol, ahead of Rubio's reported meeting with S Jaishankar in Mumbai on 20 October.
Latest: Reports repeat the letter and the MEA rebuttal; protesters allege 7,000 detained in Delhi on 10 October
The Supreme Court has issued notice to Congress, Rahul Gandhi and other INDIA bloc leaders on a petition by four lawyers seeking regulation of processions and protests near the court, a day-after-march development reported by one outlet citing Bar and Bench. This follows the opposition's "March for Democracy" toward the court over the voter-roll revision, after Chief Justice Surya Kant declined to meet them citing pending cases, and Delhi Police's earlier de-notification of Jantar Mantar as a protest site.
Latest: Supreme Court issues notice to Rahul Gandhi, INDIA bloc leaders on lawyers' plea to regulate protests
Kerala's Assembly passed a resolution moved by Chief Minister V D Satheesan seeking Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's removal, with UDF and LDF support and three BJP MLAs opposed. On 17 October the DMK, at a Chennai meeting chaired by MK Stalin, also demanded his removal and an inquiry, and called for the Special Intensive Revision to be scrapped and the pre-revision rolls used.
Latest: DMK demands Kumar's removal, scrapping of SIR and use of pre-revision rolls
Journalist Richa Parashar has filed a complaint with the New Delhi DCP seeking an FIR against Rahul Gandhi and others. She alleges she was pulled and pushed during the 12 October protest, while Congress calls the claims a BJP-orchestrated narrative. The allegations are unproven.
The Supreme Court issued notice to Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut and journalist Nikhil Wagle on a criminal contempt petition by the Supreme Court Bar Association. The petition followed the Attorney General's consent and concerns their posts about CJI Surya Kant; both are exempt from appearing in person for now.
Latest: Supreme Court issues contempt notice to Raut and Wagle; both exempted from appearing, matter listed after two weeks
Former West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee said she may join a Cockroach Janta Party protest at Jantar Mantar on October 10, though nothing is confirmed. Coverage also reports Delhi Police detaining CJP figures, Banerjee calling this an 'undeclared Emergency', and a London protest announced by Dhruv Rathee.
Update · 17 Oct, 18:19 IST: Correction: this story was built from an article published a week earlier, before the 10 October protest.
US Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal said she was deeply concerned by reports that 130 million names had been removed from India's voter rolls and backed non-violent protest. India's ambassador in Washington, Vinay Mohan Kwatra, called the remarks interference in India's internal affairs.
On 8 October the IT ministry sent platforms an advisory asking for 'enhanced diligence' on false, altered or out-of-context posts about ongoing public events, and priority for complaints from authorised government agencies. It came as protests over the electoral roll revision and the Chief Election Commissioner grew in Delhi, and digital rights groups called for it to be withdrawn.
A look-back is scheduled for January 2027, after the final voter rolls are published on 4 January. It will compare early coverage in these stories with what was finally established: which claims about deletions held up, which outlets reported allegations as fact, and what everyone missed.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.