Latest: DMK demands Kumar's removal, scrapping of SIR and use of pre-revision rolls
Kerala's Assembly passed a resolution moved by Chief Minister V D Satheesan seeking Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's removal, with UDF and LDF support and three BJP MLAs opposed. On 17 October the DMK, at a Chennai meeting chaired by MK Stalin, also demanded his removal and an inquiry, and called for the Special Intensive Revision to be scrapped and the pre-revision rolls used. Summary updated 18 Oct, 02:06 IST
Why it matters: Opposition-ruled states and parties are now openly challenging the Election Commission over the voter-roll revision, a dispute that affects voters nationwide.
Why it matters: How India's voter rolls are revised decides who can vote in 2027; the dispute has moved from the Election Commission to the courts, the streets and diplomacy.
New developments are added here, newest first. When the headline, summary or other sections change, the earlier version is kept under “See earlier version”.
Headline before this update: Kerala Assembly seeks removal of Chief Election Commissioner
Summary before this update: Kerala's Assembly passed a resolution moved by Chief Minister V D Satheesan seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with UDF and LDF support and three BJP MLAs opposed. It alleges eligible voters were wrongly dropped during the Special Intensive Revision and asks for a selection panel that includes the Chief Justice.
Note before this update: Views are grouped by stance toward the Kerala government, which moved the resolution; only three articles could be read.
“What's missing” before this update:
Based on 4 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 0 of 15. Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
Views are grouped by stance as tagged; the DMK report rests on the party's own resolution and carries no Election Commission response.
Why: Relays DMK's access-focused case that SIR deletes eligible voters, with civil-liberties framing and no ECI response. Sourcing is one-sided, though it is a party-resolution report and not own-voice commentary.
Why: Straight report. Attributes claims about exclusion of minorities, migrants and young voters to the resolution; includes the BJP's counter-argument briefly.
Why: PTI interview on the state's Vigilance probe into the CEC; Satheesan denies vendetta. Neutral wire tone; no BJP or CEC response.
Why: Calls the resolution 'historic' and centres the claim that eligible voters were wrongly removed. BJP's reasons and the EC's response are absent.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.