A DMK parliamentary party meeting chaired by M.K. Stalin in Chennai demanded the removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, cancellation of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and a return to ballot papers. The party also backed protests by students and the Cockroach Janata Party and criticised Congress and TVK, and DMK MPs plan to petition the President.
Why it matters: The dispute over the voter-roll revision and the Election Commission's role bears on how electoral rolls and voting are run ahead of Assembly elections.
Why it matters: How India's voter rolls are revised decides who can vote in 2027; the dispute has moved from the Election Commission to the courts, the streets and diplomacy.
Based on 4 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 3 of 15 (Times of India, The Hindu, Dainik Bhaskar). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
Coverage mostly relays the DMK's own statements and resolutions; outlets differ in how much they add detail, such as the 97 lakh deletions figure, or note what is unspecified.
Why: Relays DMK's case against SIR deletions, EVMs and detentions, stressing voter exclusion and civil liberties (access framing). Sourcing is almost entirely DMK; no Election Commission response.
Why: Relays DMK's view that SIR strips valid voters of rights and that the CEC should go; no Election Commission or BJP response. Access framing and one-sided sourcing lean left.
Why: Relays DMK's SIR resolutions on voter deletions and protest crackdown, an access and civil-liberties frame. Mostly one party's voice, but no own-voice judgment, so it leans mildly left.
Why: Relays DMK demands to scrap SIR and return to ballot papers, framing voter-roll revision around alleged irregularities. Mild left lean from access framing; notes missing specifics, so tone stays fairly neutral.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.