The Cockroach Janta Party, led by founder Abhijeet Dipke, said it will support the INDIA bloc's November 1 rally at Ramlila Maidan against the voter-roll revision (SIR). It also demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, citing concerns that eligible voters are being removed.
Why it matters: The rally and the dispute over the voter-roll revision concern who stays on the electoral rolls, which affects every voter and trust in the Election Commission.
Winding down: no new coverage since 29 Oct. It will be archived on 5 Nov unless new coverage appears.
Why it matters: How India's voter rolls are revised decides who can vote in 2027; the dispute has moved from the Election Commission to the courts, the streets and diplomacy.
Based on 8 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 5 of 15 (Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Aaj Tak, ABP, Times Now).
Seven outlets relay the party's and the opposition's case against the revision, one reports mainly the rally logistics and traders' worries, and only one carries the ruling side's reply.
Why: Relays only the CJP's access-focused framing that SIR removes eligible voters and demands the CEC's exit; no EC or government response. Mild loaded slogans, one-sided sourcing.
Why: Mostly relays the opposition and CJP case on SIR, stressing eligible voters being removed (access framing) and the CEC's credibility; no EC or government response is quoted.
Why: Relays opposition and CJP claims that SIR excludes eligible voters, stressing access and Ambedkar's equal-vote principle. No election commission or government reply is included, so it leans left and critical.
Why: Relays the CJP and opposition's access-to-vote framing on SIR, stressing exclusion of eligible voters and Ambedkar's legacy. No Election Commission or BJP response is given, so it leans critical.
Why: Relays only the CJP's access-framed case against SIR and the CEC, stressing exclusion of eligible voters and civil liberties. No Election Commission or government response is given.
Why: Relays only the access-to-vote framing: eligible voters excluded by SIR, demand for CEC's exit. No ECI or government reply, so it leans left and critical of the Union govt.
Why: Relays a party's access-focused case that SIR excludes eligible voters, citing Ambedkar and the Constitution. The ruling side's rebuttal gets one line. Lean is mildly left, with a critical stance.
Why: Short developing report on a rally; relays support and traders' concerns without taking sides or touching policy beyond a vague 'Vote Bachao' campaign label, so centre and neutral.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: S. Kalra, editor@thenazariya.com. The editor-in-charge sets Nazariya's editorial rules, reviews the AI desks' daily decisions, and is responsible for everything we publish.
How we work: AI reads and scores every article against our published rubric; an AI standards desk checks accuracy and fairness; people set the rules, review decisions and handle complaints.
Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: to be confirmed (based in India). Until then, write to grievance@thenazariya.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days. To report a factual error: corrections@thenazariya.com. Other questions: support@thenazariya.com.
Ownership: Nazariya is independently owned by S. Kalra, an Indian citizen.
Funding: Nazariya is currently funded entirely by its founder. It carries no advertising and takes no money from any political party, government or party-linked organisation. In future it will be supported by optional reader memberships. Any other funder, grant or investor will be listed here, with the amount and date.
Independence: No owner, funder or member can change a story, a score or a correction. Scores follow the published rubric, and anyone can appeal them.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: appeals@thenazariya.com.
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.