YSRCP chief Jagan Mohan Reddy said he regrets his party's 2023 support for the law on appointing Election Commissioners. He wants a panel of the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition and the CJI, while Union Minister Piyush Goyal said the law brought the Leader of the Opposition into the selection committee.
Why it matters: Who picks the Election Commissioners shapes trust in how India's elections and voter rolls are run, and the debate comes amid protests over the voter-roll revision.
Why it matters: How India's voter rolls are revised decides who can vote in 2027; the dispute has moved from the Election Commission to the courts, the streets and diplomacy.
Based on 5 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 3 of 15 (India Today, Zee News, Times Now). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
Critical and neutral outlets differ on emphasis: one centres Jagan's allegations against the TDP-led government, others balance them with Goyal's defence or note the claims are unverified.
Why: Mostly Jagan's allegations of undemocratic conduct and a call for a neutral election-body selection; civil-liberties and institutional-independence framing leans left, though the article is mostly a partisan claim report.
Why: Stresses the 2:1 government majority on the EC panel and the Supreme Court's doubts; leans toward institutional-independence and civil-liberties framing. Critical of Union law, though mostly relays Reddy's claims.
Why: Touches institutional neutrality and SIR voter-roll protests; reports Jagan, Goyal and protesters' demands without own-voice judgment. Slight civil-liberties/access lean, balanced by Goyal's defence, so near centre.
Why: Relays Jagan's call for neutral election commissioner selection and protection of opposition candidates' access; mild civil-liberties framing but mostly reporting his claims, with a note they were unverified.
Why: Covers an election-institution row with both Jagan's reform demand and TDP/BJP rebuttals; mild civil-liberties lean from the independence framing, but balanced sourcing keeps it centre.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.