Latest: Supreme Court issues contempt notice to Raut and Wagle; both exempted from appearing, matter listed after two weeks
The Supreme Court issued notice to Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut and journalist Nikhil Wagle on a criminal contempt petition by the Supreme Court Bar Association. The petition followed the Attorney General's consent and concerns their posts about CJI Surya Kant; both are exempt from appearing in person for now. Summary updated 17 Oct, 17:27 IST
Why it matters: The case tests where criticism of the judiciary ends and contempt begins, at a time when the Opposition and the court are in a public dispute over electoral rolls.
This matter is before the courts or under investigation. Nazariya reports what was said and alleged; it does not decide guilt or the outcome.
Why it matters: How India's voter rolls are revised decides who can vote in 2027; the dispute has moved from the Election Commission to the courts, the streets and diplomacy.
New developments are added here, newest first. When the headline, summary or other sections change, the earlier version is kept under “See earlier version”.
Headline before this update: CJP protest over voter rolls sparks political row; Singh's Musk claim lacks evidence
Summary before this update: The Supreme Court has issued a notice to Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut and journalist Nikhil Wagle on a criminal contempt petition filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association, after the Attorney General consented. Both are exempted from personal appearance and the matter is listed after two weeks. The posts followed CJI Surya Kant declining to meet Opposition leaders over electoral-roll matters, and the Solicitor General backed the plea while Wagle has apologised.
Note before this update: Coverage of the contempt notice is largely uniform and neutral; two articles cover a separate Supreme Court hearing on Mahua Moitra's access to her constituency.
“What's missing” before this update:
Based on 4 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 2 of 15 (Hindustan Times, Dainik Bhaskar). Most of India’s largest outlets, including NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu and Indian Express, block our reader in this prototype, so their coverage is missing here. The launch pipeline reads their public feeds.
Coverage broadly agrees on the facts; outlets differ only in how much background they give, such as the badminton claim and Wagle's apology.
No real disagreement between sides in this coverage.
Why: Reports the contempt petition and AG consent using the petitioner's account and legal text; touches civil liberties and security-state themes mildly, with little opposition response, so near centre.
Why: Mostly a factual relay of Live Law reporting on contempt moves against Raut and Wagle; touches civil liberties and judiciary mildly, with balanced sourcing and no loaded wording.
Why: Plain report of a contempt notice. It touches civil liberties and SIR only in passing. Both the court and SCBA side and the background of the criticism appear, with no loaded wording.
Why: Plain report of a court notice with both the court and the SCBA/government law officers quoted; no loaded wording. Touches civil liberties and speech only lightly, so it stays centrist.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.