At a Margao rally closing Congress's 27-day Goy Rakhon Yatra, Rahul Gandhi alleged that Modi plans, Shah operationalises and CEC Gyanesh Kumar implements 'vote theft', and said all three would face justice. One outlet reports a BJP reply from Keshav Prasad Maurya, who cited the Emergency against Congress; most other reports carry no BJP or Election Commission response.
Why it matters: Allegations against the Election Commission and the voter-roll revision touch the trust in elections that matters to voters across India, and Goa goes to the polls in 2027.
Why it matters: How India's voter rolls are revised decides who can vote in 2027; the dispute has moved from the Election Commission to the courts, the streets and diplomacy.
Based on 6 articles read in full. Scores describe each article's framing, not the outlet and not whether it is accurate.
Large outlets read: 4 of 15 (Times of India, Aaj Tak, Times Now, Jagran).
All six outlets lean critical or neutral and rely mostly on Gandhi's own words; only one carries a BJP reply, and none carries an Election Commission response.
Why: Relays Rahul Gandhi's charges of vote theft and crony capitalism with no BJP or EC reply; ACCESS framing on voter deletions, civil-liberties and anti-billionaire welfare themes lean left.
Why: Relays Rahul Gandhi's charges of vote theft, pellet guns on student protesters and Constitution defence, with no BJP reply. Civil-liberties and anti-state-power framing leans left, though it is mostly rally reporting.
Why: Relays Gandhi's 'vote chori' charges over SIR, framing electoral roll revision as an attack on the Constitution; mostly one-sided sourcing, with no BJP or EC reply. Touches civil liberties and access.
Why: Relays Rahul Gandhi's vote-theft, SIR, constitution and student-protest claims almost entirely in his words, with no BJP reply. Voter-access and civil-liberties framing leans left; the heavy tilt is stance.
Why: Relays Gandhi's attacks on RSS-BJP, billionaire favouritism and vote deletion (access framing) almost entirely in his voice, with no government reply. Pro-welfare, secular-pluralist themes; mostly his claims, so moderate.
Why: Reports Rahul Gandhi's 'vote chori' and constitution-defender claims alongside a BJP rebuttal. Mild civil-liberties and institutional-trust framing, balanced sourcing, neutral wording; little policy substance.
Critical, Neutral or Supportive, scored separately. It refers to the Union government unless the story is about a state. On the spectrum strip, each dot is an article: its position is the ideology score and its colour is the stance.
If an article would score differently with the parties' roles reversed, that signal is partisanship. It goes into the stance tag, not the ideology score.
High, Medium or Low, based on how much of the article was read, how many clear signals it has, and whether they agree.
Stories with fewer than five articles are marked. A blindspot is a contested story where we found coverage from only one side.
Articles that touch none of the three dimensions, such as a car launch or a match report, carry no ideology score.
This prototype is refreshed by hand (last on 17 Oct, 03:00 IST). At launch:
| Wires and the top 20 outlets | checked every 5 minutes |
| All other outlets | checked every 15 minutes |
| New story | goes up at 3 articles from 2 or more outlets, marked Limited coverage |
| Live stories | new articles added every 15 minutes; summary rewritten at most hourly |
| Home page order | every 15 minutes |
New facts go into a dated update log at the top of the story. New articles carry an “Added” tag. If a note or list changes, the earlier version stays viewable.
A story is Live while coverage arrives, Winding down after about 2 days without new coverage, and Archived after about 7. Nothing is deleted: links never change, archived scores are frozen, and stories stay on their issue pages and in search.
NDTV, India Today, Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, Indian Express, News18, ABP, Times Now and Mint block the reader used for this prototype, so their articles are missing. Each story shows how many of India’s 15 largest outlets we read. The launch pipeline will read outlets’ public feeds, TV transcripts and Hindi articles.
Editor-in-charge: [name to be added before launch]. Grievance officer under the IT Rules, 2021: [name and contact to be added before launch]. Complaints are acknowledged within 24 hours and resolved within 15 days.
[Who owns and funds Nazariya, to be published before launch]. Nazariya will list every funder and will not accept money from any political party.
Anyone, including the outlet that published an article, can appeal a score: tap any score on a story page, then "Appeal this score" to write to the editor. Outlets can also dispute a summary. The editor reviews every appeal, and any change is recorded below. Appeals: [appeals email to be added before launch].
No detail that could identify a child or a survivor of sexual violence (Juvenile Justice Act, POCSO, BNS section 72). Court cases are reported as what was said and alleged. No analysis of a poll in the 48 hours before voting there (Representation of the People Act, section 126). Press Council and NBDSA norms on communal incidents.